13 Conclusion

Conclusion

In summary, POCUS has proven to be a valuable diagnostic modality for evaluating DVT, offering rapid bedside assessment with high diagnostic accuracy when performed by adequately trained clinicians. It has the potential to expedite diagnosis, reduce the length of stay in clinical settings, and possibly decrease healthcare costs. While both 2-point and 3-point protocols are effective, further research is needed to refine training protocols and assess the long-term impacts of POCUS on patient care and healthcare systems.

References

1. Varrias, D., Palaiodimos, L., Balasubramanian, P., Barrera, C. A., Nauka, P., Arfaras-Melainis, A., … & Galen, B. (2021). The use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. Journal of clinical medicine, 10(17), 3903.
2. Lee, J. H., Lee, S. H., & Yun, S. J. (2019). Comparison of 2-point and 3-point point-of-care ultrasound techniques for deep vein thrombosis at the emergency department: a meta-analysis. Medicine, 98(22).
3. Fischer, E. A., Kinnear, B., Sall, D., Kelleher, M., Sanchez, O., Mathews, B., … & Olson, A. P. (2019). Hospitalist-operated compression ultrasonography: a point-of-care ultrasound study (HOCUS-POCUS). Journal of general internal medicine, 34, 2062-2067.
4. Tan, G., & Ng, M. (2021). Emergency department point-of-care ultrasound for upper extremity deep venous thrombosis ED POCUS for upper extremity DVT. International Journal of Emergency Medicine, 14, 1-4.